
Direct Hiring Versus Recruiting
When a company advertises a vacant position, it is essentially hosting an open house for applicants. Dozens, perhaps hundreds of resumes come through the door, and each must be processed. Many candidates are unqualified, and their resumes must be tossed. The company may take additional time to notify rejected applicants. Once the lengthy process of narrowing down qualified applicants to a manageable few is concluded, these candidates are invited for phone and in person interviews, which are also time-consuming endeavors. Background and reference checks are performed. In the end, the company has invested time, energy and finances in this process to wind up with the best of the lot—but often not the best.
On the other hand, when a business hires a recruiting firm, it can trust the screening process to an entity dedicated to exactly that, and meanwhile it can go on conducting its actual revenue-producing activities. Instead of passively inviting a pool of assorted job hunters with wide-ranging qualifications (many grossly unrelated to the position), a recruiter will actively seek the best, most qualified applicants in a highly targeted search.
Much of the success of recruiting lies in its distinction from the process mentioned above, commonly referred to as direct hiring. With the latter, it is the applicant who seeks the right job for him/herself. Thus, as business writer Sam Godin frames it, “[W]e end up hiring people who are good at self-marketing, not at what we need them to do.” On the other hand, with recruiting, it is the recruiter who seeks the right applicant for the position.
This of course means that the candidate may not currently be seeking a new job. Thus instead of merely advertising a position, the recruiter is charged with the task of marketing the position to prospective candidates. He/she is tasked with demonstrating how the new position, with its responsibilities, challenges, salary, benefits, re-location, and so on, will prove to be an overall more fulfilling experience than a candidate’s current one.
Godin states: “Recruiting is the act of finding the very best person for a job and persuading them to stop doing what they’re doing and come join you.” It requires a highly attractive position to entice the finest candidate. But rather than hoping he/she walks through the door, a recruiter’s job is to pursue such candidates with gusto and then deliver the very best to the hiring business.


